Neo - Fregeanism Reconsidered ∗

ثبت نشده
چکیده

Mathematical Platonism is the view that mathematical objects exist. Traditional Pla-tonists believe that a world with no mathematical objects is consistent; subtle Platonists believe that such a world would be inconsistent. The easiest way of getting a handle on traditional Platonism is by imagining a creation myth. On the first day God created light; by the sixth day, she had created a large and complex world, including black holes, planets and sea-slugs. But there was something left to be done. So on the seventh day she created mathematical objects. Only then did she rest. On this view, it is easy to make sense of a world with no mathematical objects: it is just like the world we are considering, except that God rested on the seventh day. The crucial feature of this creation myth is that God needed to do something extra in order to bring about the existence of mathematical objects: something that wasn't already in place when she created black holes, planets and sea-slugs. According to subtle Platonists, this is a mistake. A subtle Platonist believes that for the number of the Fs to be eight just is for there to be eight planets. So when God created eight planets she thereby made it the case that the number of the planets was eight. More generally, subtle * For their many helpful comments I am grateful to Roy Cook and Matti Eklund, and to audiences at

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Neo-Fregeanism: An Embarrassment of Riches

Neo-Fregeans argue that substantial mathematics can be derived from a priori abstraction principles, Hume’s Principle connecting numerical identities with one:one correspondences being a prominent example. The embarrassment of riches objection is that there is a plurality of consistent but pairwise inconsistent abstraction principles, thus not all consistent abstractions can be true. This paper...

متن کامل

226 Critical Studies / Book Reviews

1. Introduction Bob Hale and Crispin Wright have gathered together fifteen of their papers, two of them jointly authored, on abstraction, logicism, neo-Fregeanism and Hume's Principle (HP):

متن کامل

Neo-Fregeanism and Quantifier Variance

Sider argues that, of maximalism and quantifier variance, the latter promises to let us make better sense of neo-Fregeanism. I argue that neo-Fregeans should, and seemingly do, reject quantifier variance. If they must choose between these two options, they should choose maximalism. 1: Introduction Benacerraf’s problem lies at the heart of philosophy of mathematics: the truth of mathematical sta...

متن کامل

Indexical Sinn: Fregeanism versus Millianism Sinn Indexical: Fregeanismo versus Millianismo

This paper discusses two notational variance views with respect to indexical singular reference and content: the view that certain forms of Millianism are at bottom notational variants of a Fregean theory of reference, the Fregean Notational Variance Claim; and the view that certain forms of Fregeanism are at bottom notational variants of a direct reference theory, the Millian Notational Varian...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011